<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense of Expectations of Proper Christian Conduct</title>
	<link>http://breathlessnoon.com/2006/08/10/in-defense-of-expectations-of-proper-christian-conduct/</link>
	<description>Religion, Philosophy, Life</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: tvukg hbgq</title>
		<link>http://breathlessnoon.com/2006/08/10/in-defense-of-expectations-of-proper-christian-conduct/#comment-73320</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://breathlessnoon.com/2006/08/10/in-defense-of-expectations-of-proper-christian-conduct/#comment-73320</guid>
					<description>gbflk bgpljw kmxuoyh wgcrbl zsji ulnqmo nvqcx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gbflk bgpljw kmxuoyh wgcrbl zsji ulnqmo nvqcx
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: lexapro how</title>
		<link>http://breathlessnoon.com/2006/08/10/in-defense-of-expectations-of-proper-christian-conduct/#comment-18691</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 05:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://breathlessnoon.com/2006/08/10/in-defense-of-expectations-of-proper-christian-conduct/#comment-18691</guid>
					<description>lexapro to &lt;a href="http://lexapro1.beeplog.it" rel="nofollow"&gt;depression lexapro&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lexapro to <a href="http://lexapro1.beeplog.it" rel="nofollow">depression lexapro</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Testing</title>
		<link>http://breathlessnoon.com/2006/08/10/in-defense-of-expectations-of-proper-christian-conduct/#comment-782</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://breathlessnoon.com/2006/08/10/in-defense-of-expectations-of-proper-christian-conduct/#comment-782</guid>
					<description>I like your site. : &lt;a href="http://www.google.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Testing&lt;/a&gt;. What do you think about my site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your site. : <a href="http://www.google.com" rel="nofollow">Testing</a>. What do you think about my site?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Amber Simmons</title>
		<link>http://breathlessnoon.com/2006/08/10/in-defense-of-expectations-of-proper-christian-conduct/#comment-25</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://breathlessnoon.com/2006/08/10/in-defense-of-expectations-of-proper-christian-conduct/#comment-25</guid>
					<description>Thanks for that lovely post, Dan. I'll definitely check out the book you've recommended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that lovely post, Dan. I&#8217;ll definitely check out the book you&#8217;ve recommended.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dan</title>
		<link>http://breathlessnoon.com/2006/08/10/in-defense-of-expectations-of-proper-christian-conduct/#comment-19</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 22:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://breathlessnoon.com/2006/08/10/in-defense-of-expectations-of-proper-christian-conduct/#comment-19</guid>
					<description>Thank you for the well thought out post. This follows some of my own thoughts on the subject.

As a Christian, if I do not follow the teachings of Christ, I have failed.  As a human, sometimes I will fail.  I must accept both as true.  But when I fail, I must not make the failure as an excuse not to try.  Christ did not die so that I could remain in my sin, he died so that I could be free.

If you're interested, there is a book that goes in great detail about this.  It's called "The Cost of Discipleship" by Dietrich Bonhoeffer. The book describes Bonhoeffer's position that being a Christian without following Jesus cheapens grace. He claims that true grace is "costly" in terms of our personal sacrifice.

We are justified by faith alone.  But the corollary is that we must sacrifice our own life for the cause of God.

If you take the first position but not the second, you get cheap grace that doesn't change lives.  Reverse that, and you get salvation by works, which is not IMO how the Bible describes it.  The point being, you need both to be a Christian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the well thought out post. This follows some of my own thoughts on the subject.</p>
<p>As a Christian, if I do not follow the teachings of Christ, I have failed.  As a human, sometimes I will fail.  I must accept both as true.  But when I fail, I must not make the failure as an excuse not to try.  Christ did not die so that I could remain in my sin, he died so that I could be free.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested, there is a book that goes in great detail about this.  It&#8217;s called &#8220;The Cost of Discipleship&#8221; by Dietrich Bonhoeffer. The book describes Bonhoeffer&#8217;s position that being a Christian without following Jesus cheapens grace. He claims that true grace is &#8220;costly&#8221; in terms of our personal sacrifice.</p>
<p>We are justified by faith alone.  But the corollary is that we must sacrifice our own life for the cause of God.</p>
<p>If you take the first position but not the second, you get cheap grace that doesn&#8217;t change lives.  Reverse that, and you get salvation by works, which is not IMO how the Bible describes it.  The point being, you need both to be a Christian.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Amber Simmons</title>
		<link>http://breathlessnoon.com/2006/08/10/in-defense-of-expectations-of-proper-christian-conduct/#comment-11</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://breathlessnoon.com/2006/08/10/in-defense-of-expectations-of-proper-christian-conduct/#comment-11</guid>
					<description>You're absolutely right, of course. Charity is in ward and outward. But I think that what really causes the outward charity isn't love of man himself, becuase by nature that love can be fickle. I think it's the love for God that manifests in chairty towards mankind. I think it's the ability to see these people as 'part and particle' of God and to therefore love them accordingly. Utimately I think charity is an extension of our love for God, rather than affection or even compassion for other people.

In that sense, maybe it's all the more important to keep in touch with that awe of God. That awe is so important in our love of God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right, of course. Charity is in ward and outward. But I think that what really causes the outward charity isn&#8217;t love of man himself, becuase by nature that love can be fickle. I think it&#8217;s the love for God that manifests in chairty towards mankind. I think it&#8217;s the ability to see these people as &#8216;part and particle&#8217; of God and to therefore love them accordingly. Utimately I think charity is an extension of our love for God, rather than affection or even compassion for other people.</p>
<p>In that sense, maybe it&#8217;s all the more important to keep in touch with that awe of God. That awe is so important in our love of God.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul R. Redmond</title>
		<link>http://breathlessnoon.com/2006/08/10/in-defense-of-expectations-of-proper-christian-conduct/#comment-9</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://breathlessnoon.com/2006/08/10/in-defense-of-expectations-of-proper-christian-conduct/#comment-9</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;"Love isn’t something that we feel so much as something we do. Christ doesn’t ask his followers to merely harbor tender affections towards his neighbor. Christ asks his followers to reach out toward his neighbor, to draw him into his own awareness...We don’t have to like our neighbor to love him. We don’t have to cultivate tender thoughts toward him (though that helps). The only requirement is to behave toward him in a way that draws him toward God."&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Your commonality of Baptism can help identify a Christian outwardly, but charity is both inward and outward. While at first it may be only an outward expression of love, if it does not translate into an inner feeling of love for all mankind (love, as in caring for that person as a child of God.), the outward expressions will turn into hollow actions that will not persist. These outward expressions do stimulate inner love, but are dross without inward love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;Love isn’t something that we feel so much as something we do. Christ doesn’t ask his followers to merely harbor tender affections towards his neighbor. Christ asks his followers to reach out toward his neighbor, to draw him into his own awareness&#8230;We don’t have to like our neighbor to love him. We don’t have to cultivate tender thoughts toward him (though that helps). The only requirement is to behave toward him in a way that draws him toward God.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Your commonality of Baptism can help identify a Christian outwardly, but charity is both inward and outward. While at first it may be only an outward expression of love, if it does not translate into an inner feeling of love for all mankind (love, as in caring for that person as a child of God.), the outward expressions will turn into hollow actions that will not persist. These outward expressions do stimulate inner love, but are dross without inward love.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
