<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Designs That Fail</title>
	<link>http://breathlessnoon.com/2006/12/05/designs-that-fail/</link>
	<description>Religion, Philosophy, Life</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: lgsoftam</title>
		<link>http://breathlessnoon.com/2006/12/05/designs-that-fail/#comment-15014</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://breathlessnoon.com/2006/12/05/designs-that-fail/#comment-15014</guid>
					<description>Good site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good site!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Amber Simmons</title>
		<link>http://breathlessnoon.com/2006/12/05/designs-that-fail/#comment-1142</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 21:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://breathlessnoon.com/2006/12/05/designs-that-fail/#comment-1142</guid>
					<description>So the author says, "Muybridge’s discovery that the perception of motion is based on the inferred connection between discrete still moments ultimately changed the way we tell stories and imagine ourselves."

He may be right about that, but it doesn't change the way we write articles! :p

Yeah, it's definitely a case of synthesis gone bad. I understand what he was *trying* to do, but he fails miserably. Especially jarring, I think, is the inclusion of the images between paragraphs. I kept wanting the images to "fill in the blanks", and when they didn't, I became more frustrated and confused.

There's just a lot wrong with that piece, I think. They've been doing some weird stuff over at DO lately; I hope this trend dies soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the author says, &#8220;Muybridge’s discovery that the perception of motion is based on the inferred connection between discrete still moments ultimately changed the way we tell stories and imagine ourselves.&#8221;</p>
<p>He may be right about that, but it doesn&#8217;t change the way we write articles! :p</p>
<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s definitely a case of synthesis gone bad. I understand what he was *trying* to do, but he fails miserably. Especially jarring, I think, is the inclusion of the images between paragraphs. I kept wanting the images to &#8220;fill in the blanks&#8221;, and when they didn&#8217;t, I became more frustrated and confused.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s just a lot wrong with that piece, I think. They&#8217;ve been doing some weird stuff over at DO lately; I hope this trend dies soon.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Melle</title>
		<link>http://breathlessnoon.com/2006/12/05/designs-that-fail/#comment-1141</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 21:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://breathlessnoon.com/2006/12/05/designs-that-fail/#comment-1141</guid>
					<description>That's just ellipsis abuse. Of course, it's also just old-fashioned, I guess, to think that people should have a grasp on the rules of language before they begin deconstructing them for artistic impact.

Or, in other words: typo much, buddy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s just ellipsis abuse. Of course, it&#8217;s also just old-fashioned, I guess, to think that people should have a grasp on the rules of language before they begin deconstructing them for artistic impact.</p>
<p>Or, in other words: typo much, buddy?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
